Tuesday, November 4, 2008
There are many who believe that the election should be a simple popularity contest, with the candidate who receives the most votes by the general public declared the winner.
In their view, if John McCain receives 50,000,001 votes and Obama receives 50,000,000 then McCain is the winner.
Simple logic should tell you that is a poor way to choose. After all, we all understand that there is fraud in some voting precincts. Would you want a close election stolen by dozens of votes across the country cast by Mick E. Mouse, among others.
Also, America is made up of diverse populations and communities. Why should a few states with large urban city populations such as New York and California determine who the President will be, with smaller rural states such as Oklahoma, Louisiana, Missouri, and Tennessee always at the whim of these cities?
So this brings up two important questions. First, why have a popular vote at all? Second, who makes up this Electoral College, and how does it work? Let's take the 2nd question first.
The Electoral College is a body of delegates who elected based on rules set up in each of the respective states.
Each state receives a number of delegates based on the number of U.S. Senators and Congresspersons in their state, which in turn is based on the state population. So in the end, states delegate allotments are based on their population size.
These delegates/electors are supposed to vote based on the popular vote results, thus the importance of your individual vote.
If you vote for Obama today, and if he in turn wins the popular vote in Pennsylvania, then he is supposed to get all of Pennsylvania's votes from our state delegates to the Electoral College, no matter their party affiliation.
To win the Presidency, a candidate must receive a majority of votes in the Electoral College, which would currently amount to 270 votes.
The number of electors is determined by the population figures that come with the official U.S. Census every ten years, so the specific state numbers can change based on population shifts.
The actual Electoral College 'election' comes this year on December 15th, when the electors from each state will meet in their respective state capitals to cast their ballots.
The system grew out of the original Constitutional Convention itself when our nation was being formed and its system of government being debated. Its basic philosophy is to protect smaller states from becoming dominated by the population centers of certain key 'swing states'.
While a number of proposals have come up to change the system over the decades, none has been found to be a worthy successor.
The fact is, there was never a move to make our federal election process a purely popular vote, but the current Electoral College system allows for such a vote as a part of the determining factor for who eventually is elected.
So when you cast your ballot today, rather than actually voting for John McCain (which you are doing in spirit), your vote is being cast instead for his electors/delegates.
While the vast majority of electors keep to the honor of the rules, in 2004 one elector cast a vote for John Edwards, the Dem candidate for VP, as his Presidential choice.
In 48 of the states and the District of Columbia there is a 'winner takes it all' system in which the winner of those states' popular votes get all of that states' delegates. Maine and Nebraska have slightly different systems that, in the end, usually amount to the same type of result as the others.
Candidates who receive the most nationwide total popular votes do not necessarily have to win the Electoral College. It has happened three times that the overall popular vote winner has lost the overall election in the Electoral College: 1876, 1888, and most recently in 2000.
That 2000 election for President was extremely close. Democratic candidate Al Gore and Republican candidate George W. Bush each received over 50 million votes, and in the end Gore's total was above that of Bush by just one half of one percentage point.
The voting in the Electoral College was just as close, as could be expected, and in the end would come down to whomever carried the state of Florida and its 25 electoral votes.
As the polls closed, Florida's importance was already evident, and some national media outlets declared Gore the Florida winner. If that were true, Gore would be the national winner and the President-elect. These network projections were based purely on 'exit polling' - and some skeptics would say, on biased hopes and wishes.
As the night drew on, however, it became apparent that Bush had actually carried Florida by a solid margin. That is the reason that there was such a fight in Florida. Voting procedures such as 'hanging chads' made the news, and recounts were called for in a number of Florida counties.
The fight was so close and the outcome so important that neither party was giving in to the other. With Bush leading in pretty much every count, the Supreme Court was finally called on to make a decision as to whether to allow the continued fight via recounts in Florida.
With the partisan battle already dragging on for over a month, and with the outcome apparently leaning Bush's way to all but the most ardent Democratic Party faithful, the SCOTUS ruled that the recount process was over. Bush received the 25 Florida electoral votes, and won the Electoral College by 271-266, and in turn won the Presidency.
While some protested and cried foul, the fact is that the Electoral College system had worked perfectly, reflecting the nationwide vote.
The Democrats should have been extremely disappointed by such a narrow defeat, turning over the Presidency to the Republicans after having controlled the White House for eight years under Bill Clinton. But no one should have called the Bush Presidency anything other than the legitimate narrow win that it was.
The Electoral College protects small states from big cities, ensures an educated overview before the transfer of the single most important position of power in our nation, and effects the protection of our federal system as the Founding Fathers intended, securing Democracy for all Americans.